Clear definitions of the terms behind keeping AI automations safe and accurate. No jargon, no PhD required.
AI output monitoring is the practice of automatically checking what an AI produces, before that output reaches a customer, system, or decision.
Read moreHuman-in-the-loop (HITL) means inserting a person to review and approve or reject an AI's output before the automation continues.
Read moreAI guardrails are the rules and checks that constrain what an AI is allowed to output, blocking unsafe, off-brand, or incorrect responses.
Read moreLLM as a judge uses one language model to evaluate another model's output against criteria you define, such as accuracy, tone, or relevance.
Read moreAI evaluation is the process of measuring whether an AI's output meets defined criteria for quality, accuracy, and safety.
Read moreAI quality assurance is the discipline of ensuring AI-generated outputs are accurate, consistent, and safe before and after they go live.
Read moreAn AI hallucination is when a model produces confident, plausible-sounding output that is factually wrong or fabricated.
Read moreAI agent monitoring is the practice of overseeing what autonomous AI agents do and produce, so their actions and outputs stay correct and safe.
Read moreAI observability is the ability to see what an AI system is doing and producing in production, in order to understand, debug, and trust it.
Read moreAn AI approval workflow routes an AI's output to a person for approve or reject before the automation acts on it.
Read moreAdd monitoring, guardrails, and human approval to your Make or n8n automations. Free to start.